Close Menu
CCMECCME
  • Home
  • Who are we
    • CCME
    • The President
    • The General Secretary
    • Working groups
  • News
    • News of the council
    • News of Moroccan migration
    • News of migration in the world
  • Interviews
  • Archives of the council
    • Activities
    • Media and migration
    • News
  • Resources
  • Contact us
  • Share a contribution
  • Home
  • Who are we
    • CCME
    • The President
    • The General Secretary
    • Working groups
  • News
    • News of the council
    • News of Moroccan migration
    • News of migration in the world
  • Interviews
  • Archives of the council
    • Activities
    • Media and migration
    • News
  • Resources
  • Contact us
  • Share a contribution
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn
CCMECCME
  • English
    • العربية
    • Français
  • Home
  • Who we are
    • CCME
    • The President
    • The General Secretary
    • Working groups
  • News
    • News of the Council
    • News of migration in the world
    • News of Moroccan migration
  • Resources
Podcasts بودكاست Podcasts
  • Spécial SIEL 2025
  • Programmation
  • Axes
    • Voix des amériques
    • Maroc-Belgique: Histoire, Migrations et commémorations
    • Migrations et sciences sociales : où en est la recherche sur les migrations marocaines ?
    • Écritures féminines au maroc et dans l’immigration
  • Rencontres
    • Rencontres et débats
    • Rencontres philosophiques
    • Cinéma une rétrospective des films pionniers du cinéma marocain sur l’émigration/immigration
  • Vient de paraitre
  • Hommages
CCMECCME
  • English
    • العربية
    • Français
  • Spécial SIEL 2025
  • Programmation
  • Axes
  • Rencontres
  • Vient de paraitre
  • Hommages
Home»Archives of the council»Media and migration

US Supreme Court Hands Down 2 Decisions on Immigration

Media and migration 23 June 2015Equipe de rédaction
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email WhatsApp Copy Link
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email WhatsApp Copy Link

The United States Supreme Court handed down two important decisions this week, striking down substantive due-process rights for immigrants, but offering procedural protections for immigrants who miss deadlines in deportation proceedings.

The first case, Kerry v. Din, discusses the rights of Kanishka Berashk, the spouse of Fauzia Din, to be able to immigrate to the U.S. to join Din, who is a U.S. citizen. 

After the U.S. State Department denied Berashk’s visa application, citing a broad terrorism-related statute because he used to work in the Taliban-controlled government, he sued Secretary of State John Kerry and tried to get the high court to review that denial.

No right

The Supreme Court held that because Berashk is not a U.S. citizen, he did not have the right to get a court review, and his U.S. citizen wife also did not have a due-process right to get the visa denial challenged in a federal court.

Steven Yale-Loehr, a law professor at Cornell University, said the Supreme Court’s decision on this case has a much broader impact on immigration to the U.S. 

“If a U.S. citizen marries a Chinese citizen in China and tries to petition through the green-card process to have the foreign spouse come over to the United States, and if the U.S. (consulate) in Guangzhou were to deny the visa because the foreign spouse is a former member of the Communist Party, or they allege maybe the Chinese citizen committed some crimes in the past even though it is unproven, that would not be reviewable in the U.S. court,” Yale-Loehr said.

That means the couple would be either separated or the U.S. citizen spouse would have to move to China to live there with his or her spouse, he added.

Kerry William Bretz, a New York-based immigration attorney, said the court clearly separated the rights for people inside and outside the U.S.

“Due process applies to people who are in the United States, whether you are a citizen, not a citizen and you cross the border without inspection,” Bretz said. “It does not apply to people abroad.

“Most of the folks that are looking for review of the denial of visas are abroad and they are asking for a nonimmigrant visa, and any nonimmigrant visa is at the discretion of the Department of State,” he said.

Deportation proceedings

In the second case the Supreme Court decided recently, Mata v. Lynch, Noel Reyes Mata, an undocumented immigrant from Mexico, was put in deportation proceedings after he was convicted of assault.

Mata’s appeal was ultimately denied by the Immigration Board of Appeals after his attorneys failed to submit the appeals brief and later missed the deadline in filing motions to reopen the case.

After the lower court dismissed Mata’s case, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the federal appeals court has the authority to hear his case and decide whether people facing deportation should be able to extend the deadlines in immigration proceedings. 

Yale-Loehr, of Cornell University, said the Supreme Court emphasized procedural protections in immigration deportation proceedings.

“The Supreme Court said, ‘Look, we are not going to decide whether the Mexican citizen case should be overturned, but at least the federal court has jurisdiction to hear the case.’ ”

Day in court

Bretz, the New York-based immigration attorney, said the due-process clause of the U.S. Constitution essentially means giving people a day in court, and there are rules on that.

“If you intentionally break those rules, you are not going to have your day in court. But if your lawyer makes mistakes, because we are all human, you should be able to still seek redress,” he said.

Bretz said that is basically what the decision says. “The lawyer clearly missed a deadline so the person did not have adjudication on the merits,” he said.

Yale-Loehr noted these two decisions underscore the Supreme Court’s dichotomy on immigration issues: unlike citizens, immigrants have few substantive constitutional rights, but they can receive some procedural rights.

He said immigrants “can at least get in the door to the courthouse in some cases, but it doesn’t necessarily mean that they will win once they get in the courthouse door.”

According to Bretz, the U.S. Supreme Court has issued several other decisions since 2010 dealing with criminal grounds of deportation, and almost all of them narrowing the government’s ability to deport people for minor controlled substance offenses.

Source: Voice of America

Related Posts

Paris Attacks: the intellectuals’ forecasts that we did not heed

30 November 2015

United States: Moroccan Taxi driver shot in the back on Thanksgiving Day

30 November 2015

Refugees welcome? How UK and Germany compare on migration

3 September 2015

Migration crisis: pressure mounts on Cameron over refugees

3 September 2015

Hundreds of migrants protest at Budapest station, want to go to Germany

3 September 2015

EU refugee crisis: World mourns Syrian toddler as Andy Burnham calls for emergency Parliament debate

3 September 2015

Our latest news

Rachid Guerraoui élu membre de l'Academia Europaea

Award: Rachid Guerraoui  elected to the Academia Europaea 

19 May 2025
الرئيس الفرنسي يعين رشيد بنزين عضوا في اللجنة الوطنية للأخلاقيات

France: Rachid Benzine appointed to the national Ethics Comitee for Life Sciences and Health

16 May 2025
مشروع قانون فرنسي يخرج الجمعيات من مراكز الاعتقال الإداري

France: A Senate bill to remove NGO’s from detention centers

13 May 2025
L'Espagne et le Maroc prévoient une augmentation du nombre d'utilisateurs de l'opération « Traversée du détroit 2025 »

 Spain and Morocco hold  the 36th Spanish-Moroccan Joint Commission meeting 

8 May 2025

النشرة الإخبارية

اشترك لتلقي آخر الأخبار

قم بتنزيل تطبيق المجلس

ولا تنس تفعيل الإشعارات للحصول على آخر الأخبار!

Download CCME books for Android
Download CCME books for IOS
Logo CCME
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn

المجلس

  • Who we are
  • The President
  • The General Secretary
  • Working groups

الأخبار

  • News
  • News of Moroccan migration
  • News of migration in the world
موارد
اتصل بنا
  • محج الرياض. ش 10 ص.ب 21481 - حي الرياض - الرباط 10000 - المغرب
  • contact@ccme.org.ma
  • +212 5 37 56 71 71 اتصل بنا​

2025 - © المجلس

  • Right of access to information
  • Terms of use
  • Contact us

Newsletter

Subscribe to receive the latest news

Download the CCME app

And don’t forget to activate notifications to receive the latest news!

Download CCME books for IOS
Download CCME books for Android
Logo CCME
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn
CCME
  • Who we are
  • The President
  • The General Secretary
  • Working groups
News
  • News
  • News of Moroccan migration
  • News of migration in the world
Resources
Contact
  • Mahaj Ryad. Imm 10. B.P 21481 - Hay Ryad - Rabat 10 000 - Morocco
  • contact@ccme.org.ma
  • +212 5 37 56 71 71
© 2025 - CCME
  • Right of access to information
  • Terms of use
  • Contact us

Revue de presse

Abonnez-vous pour recevoir notre revue de presse

    Téléchargez l’application CCME

    Et n’oubliez pas d’activer les notifications pour recevoir les dernières actualités!

    Download CCME books for IOS
    Download CCME books for Android
    Logo CCME
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube LinkedIn

    CCME

    • Who we are
    • The President
    • The General Secretary
    • Working groups

    Actualités

    • News
    • News of Moroccan migration
    • News of migration in the world

    Ressources

    Contact

    • Mahaj Ryad. Imm 10. B.P 21481 - Hay Ryad - Rabat 10 000 - Maroc
    • contact@ccme.org.ma
    • +212 5 37 56 71 71

    © 2025 - CCME

    • Right of access to information
    • Terms of use
    • Contact us

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.